| GMO FREE HAWAII
Archived News! |
||||||
|
Hawaiian
farmers warn Thai farmers about genetically engineered papaya: Don't
do it!
See also The Scent
of GE Papaya - story and photos from Greenpeace
Thu 03 July 2003, Bangkok, THAILAND
A delegation of Hawaiian farmers today met with Thai farmers and community organisations warning Thailand against growing genetically engineered (GE) papaya. In an event organised by Greenpeace, the Hawaiian farmers pointed out that although the previous introduction of GE papaya had been disastrous both economically and environmentally, old promotional arguments are now used in Thailand without sharing the negative evidence.
When GE papaya was introduced 5 years ago they claimed it was a 'solution' to the papaya ringspot virus problem. But instead it has caused serious environmental and economic problems for farmers," said Melanie Bondera, a sustainable agriculture farmer and member of the Hawaii Genetic Engineering Action Network (HIGEAN) on Big Island, Hawaii.
The rejection of GE papaya in overseas markets has been devastating for Hawaiian farmers. The selling price of GE papaya has fallen to 30-40 percent below production costs, and the price that farmers get for their GE papaya is 600 percent lower than the price for organic papaya. Farmers have also discovered that 'SunUp' GE papaya is more easily infected by new plant fungi and diseases like 'blackspot' fungus. This discovery came 5 years after GE papaya was approved for commercial growing. Now farmers must spray toxic chemical fungicides on their SunUp papaya plants every 10 days.
Bondera described the anger and frustration of organic farmers who were forced to cut down all of their papaya plants because of contamination by GE papaya. GE papaya seed has contaminated seed supplies and cross-pollination of non-GE plants is widespread. "Tests have shown that GE contamination is widespread. Genetic pollution is a clear violation of farmers' rights to choose what they grow and how they grow it," she added.
While GE papaya was proving a disaster in Hawaii, the same US scientists and companies worked with Thailand's Department of Agriculture and the Department of Science & Technology to develop GE papaya in Thailand. Backed by the global GE industry giant, Monsanto, which holds several patents on GE papaya, open-air field trials of GE papaya were carried out in several locations throughout Thailand. Now these corporate-sponsored scientists say that GE papaya is 'safe' and is ready for commercial growing by farmers. "The developers of GE papaya are saying that it's ready for commercial release in Thailand. But the message from Hawaii is very clear: GE papaya is an ecological disaster," said Varoonvarn Svansopakul, Genetic Engineering Campaigner for Greenpeace Southeast Asia.
The consequences of growing GE papaya in Thailand are feared to be even more serious Hawaii. Not only is green papaya eaten as a daily staple food, it is also grown everywhere - in farmers' fields, schoolyards and backyard gardens. "That means the kind of GE contamination seen in Hawaii will be multiplied a hundred-fold, and there's no way that seed contamination or cross-pollination can be prevented," Varoonvarn added. These concerns were reinforced by Dr.Janet Cotter, Greenpeace scientist in the United Kingdom. Speaking at today's public event, Dr Cotter presented the findings of a scientific report on the potential ecological and health risks of GE papaya. "Even those scientists who developed GE papaya recognise that GE contamination of non-GE papaya is inevitable. Once it's out there, it's out of control," said Dr Cotter. "The fact is that GE is a crude and imprecise technology, subject to unexpected and unpredictable effects. In the case of GE papaya scientists aren't even sure why it has resistance to the ringspot virus, or whether this creates new ecological risks. This includes the risk of new strains of the virus that would have a lasting impact on the environment."
Also addressing Thai farmers and community organisations was Jon Biloon, a farmer with 30 years' experience of sustainable agricultural farming in Big Island, Hawaii. Biloon argues that GE papaya is unnecessary. "There are practical solutions to ringspot virus that are friendly to the environment and better for farmers. This makes GE papaya totally unnecessary," Biloon said. Biloon has developed an organic system to deal with ringspot virus and is organising training workshops and helping other farmers to introduce ecologically sustainable methods for managing plant diseases like ringspot.
"The message that the Hawaiian farmers bring to us today is clear: we must not allow GE papaya to be released into the environment. It's not too late. We must act now to say no to GE papaya," Varoonvarn concluded.
The May 26, 2003 issue of Time expands the vocabulary of genetic engineering. The article, "Cures on the Cob," portrays developments in the lucrative U.S. biotech industry. A few years back, "Frankenfoods" was coined to describe fears of consumer advocates regarding genetically engineered foods sprouting like hundreds of Frankenstein monsters. Time has introduced mainstream readers to more current jargon: pharm crops, biopharmers, molecular farming, pharmacorn, and Pharmageddon.
Time reports biotech firms like Epicyte Pharmaceutical of San Diego are growing "pharm crops" (food crops with genetically-implanted drugs) with hopes of creating new drugs for awful diseases. In this way, they expect to overcome the health and safety concerns of environmentalists, consumer groups, and anxious food purveyors.
For commentary and text of the article, see http://www.thecampaign.org,
the web site of The Campaign to Label Genetically Engineered Foods.
NEWS ARCHIVE
NEWSFLASH -FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT:
Protest Rally Held Against Genetic Violations on Kauai
Experts and Citizens Demonstrate in Response to Recent EPA Fines of Pioneer/DuPont
Lihue, Kauai--This morning, concerned citizens joined with scientific and legal experts to protest the repeated violations of federal regulations committed by Pioneer/DuPont in genetic engineering field trials on Kauai. Speakers warned of the hazards that genetic tests pose to the economy, environment, and public health of the citizens of Kauai. In the wake of the recent fines, they called on DuPont to publicly disclose what genetic crops are being tested on the island and where they are being grown. They also called for meaningful safety testing to prove that these genetic experiments are safe for the citizens and environment of Kauai.
"Genetic engineering companies tell us that their experiments are safe and that we should just take their word for it," said Noli Hoye, spokesperson for GMO-Free Kauai, the citizen group that sponsored the event. "But I ask them, how can we believe you when you will not follow the regulations that the government imposes on you? How can we believe you when you will not tell us the most basic information about what you are testing on our island?"
"We can no longer take DuPont’s word when they tell us that these experiments are safe," said Steven Druker, executive director of the Alliance for Biointegrity who is currently on Kauai in response to the recent EPA fines. "It‘s time for solid, substantiated facts rather than grandiose, unfounded claims."
The Environmental Protection Agency fined Pioneer Hi-Bred, a subsidiary of DuPont, in December of last year for planting experimental corn not approved for human consumption too close to a seed crop. The EPA then required the company to conduct further tests and to promptly notify them of any contamination in neighboring crops. They were also required to submit maps to the EPA identifying the location of any tainted plants within five days. DuPont failed to meet these requirements and was fined $72,000, the highest fine ever levied by the EPA in their regulation of genetic engineering field tests.
Louisa Wooten, an organic farmer from Kauai who serves on the Certification Board of the Hawaii Organic Farmers Association, explained the threat to organic agriculture highlighted by the fines. "Because these trials are conducted in the open air, we knew there was a chance of cross-pollination," said Wooten. "With the recent EPA fines, we know for certain that cross pollination is happening. Despite the fact that contamination by GMOs could lose an organic farmer their certification, we still have no right to know if our fields are at risk of being contaminated."
Roger van Stelle, a molecular biologist and medical doctor who lives on Kauai,
explained the health risks of genetic field trials on
Kauai. He cited studies in which animals that were fed genetically engineered
foods suffered abnormal pregnancies, damage to immune systems, and injury to
vital organs. "If these were pharmaceutical drugs undergoing test trials,
they would be thrown in
the trash. It would be malpractice if I prescribed anything with these
kinds of toxic side effects," said van Stelle.
In the citizen list of demands presented by GMO-Free Kauai, the group called for DuPont to do two things: "Give us the right to know what you are growing on our island and where, and show us meaningful tests that can prove these crops are safe for our health and our environment. Particularly after these fines by the EPA, it is clear that we need the facts about the genetic experiments that you are conducting on Kauai."
The state of Hawaii currently has more genetic field trials
per acre than any other place in the world.
********************
GMO-Free Kauai is a volunteer citizen group that works to raise awareness and
educate the public about the health, economic, and environmental risks of genetically
engineered organisms, while providing meaningful ways to work towards creating
a GMO-Free Kauai. For more information, go to www.gmofreekauai.org ,
call GMO-Free Kauai at (808)651-9603, or email gmofreekauai@care2.com mailto:gmofreekauai@care2.com.
Photos available.